
The other issue is whether once you've bought term insurance, you really will invest the difference. Most people who by term insurance don't. They take the money they've saved by not buying whole life or universal life and use it for a trip to beaches, or to buy new clothes, or a used car, or whatever prospects tell them they only want term insurance is, "If you save as much in the next ten years as you've saved in the last ten years, will you have be satisfied?" Most people must answer no, because they have not been saving or investing. Their money has been slipping through their fingers.
Cash value life insurance has been a boon to millions of Americans, because it has forced them to save in spite of themselves. They've had to pay their insurance premiums or lose the coverage they knew needed; in the process they built up cash value in their policies. (In this, life insurance replicates the savings function of a home mortgage; homeowners must make their monthly payments, and thus build up equity in their homes, if they don't want to lose them.) The return on such insurance0driven savings (at least in whole life policies) has been low, but at least there have been savings.
Be honest with yourself. If you're unlikely to develop and maintain your own investment program, or you don't want the responsibility or cares of doing so, then you would be well advised to buy universal life. You and only you can decide if you're willing and able to invest on your own initiatives on a relentlessly regular basis. Only you can decide whether you're willing to shoulder the risks involved in making your own investments. And you have to weigh the tax consequences of investing on your own versus letting assets accumulates on a carefully thought about all that, you may very well decide you're better off buying pure insurance from an insurance company and doing your own investing.
Read More On Related Post

RSS Feed